Volume II: Filmography

THE WOMAN WHO DID NOT CARE

April 1, 1913 (Tuesday)

Length: 1 reel

Character: Drama

Cast: Marguerite Snow, William Garwood (the eloper), Fred Vroom (the father), James Cruze, Mignon Anderson, Jean Darnell (the witch), David H. Thompson (the one-legged man)

Notes: 1. The title was probably taken from the woman who did not care in Kipling's poem, The Vampire, which inspired the play and film, A Fool There Was (Fox, six reels, 1915; Lubin issued a one-reel film with this title, in 1914). Alternatively, the title may have been inspired by Eva Tanguay, the best known and most heavily advertised vaudeville personality of the time, who was known as the I Don't Care Girl, from her sign-off song, I Don't Care. 2. The release date was given erroneously as March 28, 1913 in The Billboard, March 29, 1913.

SYNOPSIS, The Moving Picture World, April 5, 1913:

A girl beautiful, but heartless and ambitious, was the girl of a poor miner and was devotedly loved by a man in her own station of life. She accepted his attentions willingly until a young engineer came along and paid court to her. She then dismissed her first suitor. Her father made a lucky strike, and they moved to the city to enjoy their wealth. This sealed the fate of the second suitor, for a rich man became smitten with the girl and she accepted his advances. Perhaps she would have married him in time had it not been that she aroused the enmity of an old witch, deeply skilled in magic. The witch, to have revenge, brought a scarecrow to life, supplied him with a title and seemingly great wealth, and ordered him to win the girl for his bride. He did this easily, for the idea of being a nobleman appealed to the heartless girl. Her triumph was complete until the wedding day, when the witch appeared just as the ceremony was completed. She jeered at her victim, and then transformed the 'nobleman' back into a scarecrow again, so the girl was stricken down in what she had believed to be her hour of success. The story is allegorical.

REVIEW, The Morning Telegraph, April 6, 1913:

James Cruze and Marguerite Snow are the principals of this fairy play of modern life. An allegory, it is dramatic in spots and holds interest all of the way through. The girl is the daughter of a poor miner, beautiful but without heart or conscience, selfish in the extreme. She turns one lover aside for another as she rises in life, her father having struck a rich vein of ore and become wealthy. Then a miracle worker appears to the girl in the form of an old woman, and she offers the girl a titled marriage, changing a scarecrow into a nobleman. The girl accepts this suitor in preference to the others, and on the day of the wedding, when her triumph seems complete, the witch-woman turns the nobleman back into his original shape. It is very well put on and makes a striking subject.

REVIEW, The Moving Picture World, April 12, 1913:

An allegorical film story, in which a witch converts a scarecrow into a nobleman in order to punish the heartless woman who has broken so many hearts. As the wedding ceremony is in progress the nobleman again becomes a scarecrow. A successful offering of its type.

REVIEW, The New York Dramatic Mirror, April 9, 1913:

Fanciful pictures are very good in their way when well produced, but poorly produced they seem to fall with a doubly hard thud; such is the fate of this picture. She is a woman who doesn't care for anything except wealth and society. She flits from one man to another, finally marrying an incarnated scarecrow, given to her by a witch. A modern fairy tale, it might be called - perhaps - but it is all so senseless and indifferent that one is more bored than interested.

# # #